Karta ukraine online dating
I strongly believe the offensive should continue until Hamas agrees to stop sending rockets into Israel.Israel should move deeper into Gaza destroying any obstacle.Well, now I know why I did not turn on the television. Finally Bush administration is adapting itself to the possibility of a ‘shift in policy’ expected from Obama’s administration........
They are words, like ours, but at least words which might reach an agreement. WELL, IT WOULD BE BETTER IF A NUCLEAR ATTACK BE CARRIED OUT JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL THESE ANIMALS WOULD BE EXTERMINATED ONCE AND FOR ALL... Unless you planned on killing all of them too, it would not be genocide.
We must not tolerate terror but we must not fight terror with terror. If we want different results we must change our ways, same ways same results, that's why Peace can not move forward.
Hamas is insisting it wants permanent peace, stability, etc., but actually never acts in favour of this.
A resolution from the council, particularly one that passes with such large support, can put international pressure on parties involved in a conflict. Israel has said that it would not be the first to use nuclear weapons in the Middle East.
But they are in no way binding, and many in the past have been ignored by warring factions. People often make the mistake of legitimizing Hamas because it is the ruling government of Gaza, but they don't realize that Hamas's vision of peace is very narrow and simple: eliminate the existence of Israel, no compromise, no negotiations, no give-and-take, just jihad to the death. Did you see the video of the children's show that aired on Hamas TV that showed a little Palestinian taking over the White House, killing Bush, and turning the White House into a mosque? Even if you killed all the people in Gaza, by whatever means, it would still not be genocide.